The Free Radical

Part 3 begins in drama and tragedy.

On December 31, 2011, a gentleman by the name of David Hutzler publicly conveyed information to David Wilcock on behalf of Benjamin Fulford to assist in this investigation. They both directed Mr. Wilcock to the website of Unwanted Publicity Intelligence which houses many extremely sensitive documents.

On January 6, 2012, David Hutzler and his 8-year-old son burned in their home. They had both been shot to death and the fire had been deliberately set. The police investigating the case have ruled it a murder/suicide. I followed this story very closely as the investigation developed. I read numerous comments from friends and family of the victims. None of them believe that murder/suicide is even a remote possibility. I concur, but I urge you to reach your own conclusions.

This part of the investigation into the global scale of financial tyranny attempts to break down the lies and deceit, and to reveal the full scope of the problem. It goes into a great deal of detail. I will only hit the highlights. Here we go…

As Parts 1 and 2 clearly revealed, the problem really is centred around the Federal Reserve. This central banking institution is above the law and makes no secret of the fact. “The Federal Reserve is an independent agency… there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.” This statement comes from Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Fed.

For the first time in the nearly 100-year existence of the Fed, Congress managed to force an audit of the agency’s activities. What the audit revealed was utterly staggering… a 26 trillion dollar fraud! DivineCosmos.com provides some helpful pictures so readers can come to terms with the enormity of that number. We will briefly delve into it here.

The recipients of the 26 trillion include at the top of the list Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Barclays PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, UBS AG… the last four of which are not even American. The results of the audit are a proven and documented fact having been published on July 21, 2011, yet the Mainstream Media has been conspicuously silent on the whole matter. More about that later…

Let’s put the scale of the fraud into perspective. The GDP of the US is 14.12 trillion dollars. The entire national debt of the US over its 200+ years of existence amounts to 14.5 trillion. The hotly debated most recent federal budget amounts to 3.5 trillion. The money secretly and fraudulently doled out by the Fed, remember, is 26 trillion dollars. That amounts to $226,430.68 per each American household throughout the country. That’s how much was stolen from taxpayers. According to the recent documentary Thrive, poverty and environmental destruction can be ended for about 200 billion a year… less than 1% of the bailout fraud.

Congressman Bernie Saunders has further pointed out publicly that “many of the people who serve as directors of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks come from the exact same financial institutions that the Fed is in charge of regulating.” Furthermore, there is simply no justifiable reason why this amount of money was needed… and it has done virtually nothing to solve the problem.

Thanks to deregulation like the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, Wall Street has become very much like a casino gambling venture where one dollar can be leveraged up to 100 times. This has involved sums of many hundreds of trillions of dollars in the derivatives market which has created a 600 trillion dollar time bomb. If/when the derivatives market collapses it will require ten times the amount of all of the money in the world to bail it out.

Contrast this with the sensible alternatives. In order to back up the savings of every single American would cost 275.6 billion dollars. The Fed bailout was nearly 100 times that! The stock market’s Total Market Index (TMI) is worth 13.2 trillion dollars. So, half of the bailout amount could have guaranteed every stock on earth. Like I said, there is simply no justification for a bailout of this scope to save a handful of corporations which have been deemed “too big to fail.”

The bottom line of all this is that “the Fed appears to be at the epicentre of a vast interlocking directorate of companies that may earn up to 80% of the world’s wealth.” Let’s explore this proposition.

Recently, three scientists from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich used super-computers and chaos theory to see how many corporations control the world’s economy. They discovered 1,318 core companies out of a total of 43,060 transnational corporations control 80% of the world’s wealth. They further discovered a “super-entity” of 147 very tightly-knit corporations control fully 40% of the world’s wealth. The interrelations among these 147 are so intricate that essentially they all own each other’s companies. And who are “they”? They are the very same people who run the Federal Reserve. 75% of the core 147 are financial institutions… the very same ones receiving the fraudulent bailouts!

David Wilcock then goes on to break it all down as to which industries earn the most profits. One inescapable conclusion to his analysis is that it would be utterly essential for the Federal Reserve corporations to be heavily invested into oil, pharmaceuticals and the US Defence system.

Some of the familiar big names in the Fed are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. No one denies the power of these elites. David’s analysis then delves into the history of these elites, including the noteworthy moment when Nathan Rothschild essentially bought the British empire. Through a bit of insider trading at the conclusion of the battle of Waterloo, Rothschild was able to increase the family’s fortune by more than 6,500 times in a single day. This is documented history. Mass panic is big business when you already know the outcome… a lesson the elites have learned well.

Historically, the American Medical Association (AMA) has been financed by the Fed… especially through the Rockefeller Foundation. This eventually led to the “takeover”/influence of all American medical schools to ensure a drug-based paradigm which was sure to provide huge profits. This is exquisitely detailed in the book World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin which I personally highly recommend to anyone doubting this assertion.

The Rockefellers and Carnegies went on to essentially buy the US educational system. This was part of a comprehensive plan to make the schooling system benefit corporate America. To this day, the Ford Foundation is heavily involved in educational funding, and therefore exercises enormous influence over policy.

And now we turn to media consolidation, a critical cornerstone of the whole endeavour. For such a core group to exist undetected in a supposedly free society, it would be absolutely essential for such a group to control the media. This is something the elites were already bragging about in 1815! In the twenty-first century, six corporations heavily dominate all forms of US media: General Electric, Walt Disney, News Corp, Time Warner, Viacom and CBS. These corporations control the media in a vertically integrated fashion, controlling everything from initial production to final distribution. And the situation is more global than you might think as American cable TV is prominent internationally offering foreign subtitles for their programming. Why do you think suddenly nearly everyone around the world is able to speak english?

As a compelling demonstration of the apparent control of the media David offers the following clip. I like it too.

Conan O’Brien

The media, in turn, is heavily invested in pharmaceuticals and health insurance. That helps to close the circle.

David ends this section of the investigation with some answers to skeptics. Here, I’d rather add my own. Too often I hear the complaint that the one who delivers the message is untrustworthy, or a bit of a flake, or whatever… Totally irrelevant! If someone today could show that Albert Einstein was a pedophile would that in any way negate the contributions he made to science. No! A million times no! (I’m not suggesting Albert was anything but a gentleman.) My point is that the message must be critically evaluated for its content, not whether it was delivered with a foreign accent, or delivered in sloppy handwriting, or by someone who believes the moon is made of cheese. Think whatever you like about me or about David Wilcock, but do not dismiss documented truth over silly biases and prejudices. This is important stuff. I personally can think of nothing in the mainstream news that even comes close to the importance of what is revealed in this investigation. Can you?

The original section which this summary is based upon can be found at:

Historical Details

To continue on to Part 4 click HERE.