The Free Radical

For the last 36 hours or so the Collective has been in utter turmoil.

It feels very much like an end game scenario… not the end game, but an end game.

Things that have been on the table– foremost on the Collective Mind– for the better part of two years now are demanding resolution.

Currently, Earth has only provided one timeline (organic) heading into the immediate future. There is suddenly an insistent demand– from the Collective Mind– for a second timeline to be provided.

There’s a lot going on here.

In very general terms, we have been providing contrast for each other over the past two years in order that we can individually come to a place of sovereign understanding. We have been revealing ourselves to each other as well as to ourselves– often in dramatic fashion.

And still there are many who will not budge in their ‘pat’ understanding.

There is a large segment of the Collective which we may call ‘the middle class.’ Energies are stuck. There are many who understand very well that they are enmeshed within a hierarchy. And many too understand that the structure supporting their current experience is unsustainable and corrupt. However, they are comfortable with their own position within the structure– more comfortable than venturing into the untested unknown.

Those who are committed to the shift have in essence been extending an invitation for all of humanity to redefine and reassemble itself in order to move forward en masse into uncharted waters where usury and corruption no longer hold sway… where the ability to effectively wield power over others has been deflated.

The ‘dark agenda’ has served as an anchor, holding the Collective back in this regard. The ‘dark agenda’ is all about power over others. At a very deep level, the ‘dark agenda’ has recently seen the means and the potential swiftness of its undoing. If certain counter-agendas within the unified sovereignty movement disseminate quickly, the dark will be disassembled and exposed in an explosion of unravelling– within the waking, conscious world. They will do anything they can to prevent this.

Prior to a few days ago, this unravelling was merely a vague potential on the immediate horizon. Now it has been seen in explicate detail.

The ‘dark agenda’ is incapable of surrender. They will NOT give up! Count on that.

In their panic, they are proposing a splitting of worlds. This is a topic which was discussed at length– both at the level of the Collective Consciousness as well as in the waking world– almost two years ago around the time of the December solstice of 2012. The idea is that there will be two versions of Earth. For simplicity’s sake, we will call one the Ascending Earth and the other Status Quo Earth.

Ascending Earth will be available to any who are oriented toward personal growth and greater unity.

Staus Quo Earth will be provided for those who are content to continue in a framework of domination and control.

The present organic Earth timeline is the Ascending Earth timeline. The intention initiating this timeline was one of carrying all of humanity forward together over a span of about three generations. All agreed to give it a try; that agreement was made almost two years ago.

In the meantime, the ‘lightworker community’ has seen a significant portion of its membership grow exceedingly weary. The lack of any overt positive change in the world has demoralized many light aspirants. And many are beginning to favour the split because the current stalemate is too untenable. Right now movement of any sort is considered better than no movement at all– even if it’s not exactly in the ‘right’ direction.

And, as previously suggested, there is also a large segment of the middle class which cannot accept a movement into a ‘promised’ but unknown equitable future. They’re not buying into the ascension/sovereignty narrative. In a dominance and control paradigm, they are content with their modest positions and prefer to stay there rather than risk it all on the promises of a better future. The concept of a world society without hierarchy is too foreign and literally cannot even be contemplated.

If it was merely a matter of the ‘dark agenda’ requesting a secondary timeline and a splitting of the world, their minority voice within the Collective would not be ultimately heeded. But because the call for some overt movement is coming from all three main factions within the Collective– the ‘dark’, a portion of the ‘light’, and those who are sitting on the fence– the old ‘split agenda’ is being tabled again.

Personally, I’m a bit surprised by this development.

If the split is indeed to manifest, it will present itself as a series of choices for each individual. Each of us– alone– will make choices over the next weeks (months?) according to what we personally identify as being real. The result of those individual choices will result in a division of the human collective. Exactly how that will play out on the world stage… I haven’t really a clue. Sorry.

We are very much in uncharted territory. The situation is extremely fluid and volatile. Be true to yourself. Have the courage to stand within your convictions. Demonstrate integrity in everything you do.

We seem to be at a very significant moment of truth.

(Now I need to go out to the woods and get my own head on straight. The energies last night made sleep impossible. This was reconfirmed by many, many others this morning!

I will return to this article later this afternoon in order to answer some very pertinent reader questions… to the best of my ability. Admittedly, I’ve been thrown for a bit of a loop here… but I know that whatever answers I and others seek are to be found in our individual and collective connection to Earth Mother.)

Update: September 23, 2014

Okay, let’s just jump into questions.

Q: If what you and other new-agey websites are reporting is true: that the cabal is nearly defeated, scared and desperate, why don’t they just give up and save their skins? And along the same lines, shouldn’t the Scottish independence referendum have gone the other way– if the ‘energies’ do indeed support freedom and sovereignty?

A: First, it is not in their nature to ever give up. The agenda that has been promulgated by the cabal has been in operation for many, many generations. By its very nature, the agenda is an all-or-nothing proposition. There has never been provisions for halfway measures… just a few timing delays along the way.

Each of us who has been here on Earth for multiple incarnations has taken roles on both the dark and the light sides of this agenda. None of us are purely of the light or purely of the dark. During this critical shift time, both ‘teams’ were stacked evenly with the very best ‘players’ on either side. Those ‘chosen’ (self-chosen) to represent the dark are every bit as dedicated to their mission as those representing the light. Neither side will ever just throw in the towel and give up.

It will be those of the neutral perspective who will break the stalemate and create the way forward.

Also, very importantly, in a pitched battle of this sort, there is a much larger agenda at play than the simplistic light vs. dark struggle. A key component of the larger agenda at this time is revelation or disclosure. The battle is intended to continue until every underlying truth is dragged to the surface for all to see. A swift and quiet victory would undermine the revelatory nature of the larger (absolute) plan.

The Scottish referendum is a perfect example of just this. Had the Yes side won, the deeper issues of what it means to be sovereign would be lost on much of the population. By maintaining the status quo on the surface, the deeper questions remain in the collective Scottish psyche. The idea for independence won’t just go away now that it’s been politically ‘defeated.’ It will actually gain strength through the honest convictions of the Scottish people as the issue is further contemplated by everyone.

It was also a perfect demonstration for Scotland and the rest of the international community to see how these types of elections are manipulated through scare-tactics, bribes and possibly even electoral fraud. In terms of revelation, the No vote makes more sense than a swift victory for the Yes side.

Q: I totally agree that the ISIS beheading videos are ridiculous– deserving of ridicule, but the overall situation is very serious. Wherever they came from, ISIS is a real army destroying real lives! Also, I know you’ve only mentioned it in passing, but you seem to have a similar attitude toward the whole ebola outbreak. Ebola is no laughing matter! Don’t you feel these are serious causes for concern? And if an ebola vaccine is offered in the near future, won’t you be getting one?

A: No. It’s all a media circus. I have really no idea what’s truly going on in the Middle East. But I’m damn sure that we haven’t gotten anything resembling the whole story. There are many very basic questions surrounding the whole ISIS affair which the mainstream media has refused to delve into. Who’s funding them? Who’s training them? Who’s supplying the bulk of their armaments? Why didn’t the US government immediately partner with Iraqi military forces to combat them?

These are important questions which need to be thoroughly answered… yet the mainstream media has barely touched upon them. To me, that’s more than suspicious.

And it’s the same for ebola. The mainstream narrative is dubious at best. Here’s some ‘dots’ to ponder; connect them as you see fit:

Remember the swine flu ‘pandemic’ of 2009? Does anyone know anyone whose death was confirmed as caused by actual swine flu? The number of actual laboratory-confirmed cases was ridiculously minuscule.

The current ‘ebola’ outbreak is occurring largely in places which have no history of ebola. They do however have a well-documented history of malaria, dengue fever and yellow fever, which claim at least 1.5 million lives every year.

The initial symptoms of malaria, dengue fever, yellow fever and ebola are indistinguishable. The only numbers having any significance are lab-confirmed cases of ebola… with proper documentation.

The CDC is funded through the US military.

All of the territories involving the current ‘ebola’ outbreak are very resource-rich, especially in oil. Through the declaration of a pandemic and a subsequent forced quarantine, international militias are brought in. How quickly do you suppose they’ll leave once the ‘danger’ has passed?

As for an ebola vaccine… There are certain topics I intentionally avoid. Vaccines are one such topic, but I feel I can comment on this without stirring up a hornet’s nest.

First, I am not anti-vaccine. I am pro-choice. I am only against mandated vaccines. I believe very strongly in the placebo effect. (I think the placebo effect is a major player in shaping this reality at every layer.) If anyone believes strongly in the health benefits of vaccines, they should certainly seek them out and receive as many vaccines as gives them peace of mind.

Now, as for my personal stance on vaccines… I can pretty much skirt the whole issue by stating that I don’t believe in the germ theory of disease. “Say what!?”

Yes, specific germs accompany specific symptom profiles (diseases), but I very strongly believe that germs are NOT the primary causative agents of disease. Rather, it is the state of one’s natural immunity which is the primary arbiter of sickness. Exposure to germs by itself is not the primary cause of disease– in my experience especially. I’m confident in this conclusion. I’ve written heaps on why.

Having a healthy immune system is the best protection one can have against all ‘infectious’ diseases. Vaccines are blatantly an attempt at micro-managing the human immune system. I don’t know how you feel about micro-management strategies, but I think they’re generally ineffective and often counterproductive.

Q: I’m not sure I understand what you mean by the neutral perspective. It seems wishy-washy, and dare I say, impotent? Could you perhaps explain it better?

A: The fundamental difference between the neutral perspective and a polarized perspective can be summed up in the following statements:

Polarized perspective: “I’m right; you’re wrong.”
Neutral perspective: “I’m right; you’re right.” Or to expand it slightly: “I’m right for me; you’re right for you.”

The polarized perspective always entails an aspect of ‘fighting against.’ It is not content to merely go along with what is right for itself; it further seeks to misapply its personal stance upon others, assuming that it is perfectly right for them regardless of what the others may think. It intrudes. It is intercessory by nature.

The neutral perspective is free to express and pursue its own preferences just as the polarized view does, but it stops at imposing those preferences, biases, or conclusions upon others, knowing that others can only come by their own knowledge on such matters through their own experience.

If we view a particular polarity as a line with opposite extremes at either end:

+ ______________________________ –

The neutral perspective does not merely lie in the very middle of the line, expressing no preference. It rather stands clearly above the line, in the middle, at the point where a pendulum might be fixed which swings alternately between the two extremes. The neutral perspective recognizes the entire polarity, but doesn’t engage with it in any manner which denies the pendulum’s freedom to swing its full course. The neutral perspective is transcendent of either/or choices. It can choose to be for something– lending energy, gleaning experience– without having to lend any energy whatsoever to its opposite. The neutral perspective thus wastes no energy fighting against anything.

Q: I’m not sure I understand exactly what you mean by sovereignty either…?

A: Aye, that’s the question! Like freedom, sovereignty is one of those pesky things that can only be self-defined. It cannot be granted or given to another. It can only be experienced for oneself and claimed on one’s own terms. It is central to the very mystery of being an Earth human.

And that is all I’ll say for now.